zilexa
08-01-2006, 07:49 AM
Hate to open a topic for such a basic q. Used the search.
You might think, if you're gonna use nLite, why not use it to integrate as well? No need for RVM first (or after)!
Well, I have Dutch XP and I prefer using the Dutch updatepack from January since it contains QFE fixes (hasn't been updated since.. recent versions don't contain these fixes). The problem is: integrating this pack with the newest nLite version produces errors at T9 (nlite 1.0 and 1.0.1, no errors with beta 6 and before).
Since integration of this pack with RVM Integrator takes up the same time as an entire nLite session, I hope RVM can integrate it in such a way in will not produce errors. I will then use nLite for the Litening tasks (NOT to integrate other update/add-on packs.
So 2 questions: after doing some thinking it seems logical to run RVM BEFORE nLite. Is this correct? This way I could have 1 basic up-to-date CD and create different nLited versions.
2nd: I read warnings in old topics (january 2006) on RyanVM.net it could cause errors using RVM and nLite. Do they still count?
EDIT: 3rd q: why does it take a half hour to integrate the pack I mention while nLite can do the same in a few minutes? Is the method soo different (better/safer/more stable)?
You might think, if you're gonna use nLite, why not use it to integrate as well? No need for RVM first (or after)!
Well, I have Dutch XP and I prefer using the Dutch updatepack from January since it contains QFE fixes (hasn't been updated since.. recent versions don't contain these fixes). The problem is: integrating this pack with the newest nLite version produces errors at T9 (nlite 1.0 and 1.0.1, no errors with beta 6 and before).
Since integration of this pack with RVM Integrator takes up the same time as an entire nLite session, I hope RVM can integrate it in such a way in will not produce errors. I will then use nLite for the Litening tasks (NOT to integrate other update/add-on packs.
So 2 questions: after doing some thinking it seems logical to run RVM BEFORE nLite. Is this correct? This way I could have 1 basic up-to-date CD and create different nLited versions.
2nd: I read warnings in old topics (january 2006) on RyanVM.net it could cause errors using RVM and nLite. Do they still count?
EDIT: 3rd q: why does it take a half hour to integrate the pack I mention while nLite can do the same in a few minutes? Is the method soo different (better/safer/more stable)?